FIGURE SUMMARY
Title

Dhx15 regulates zebrafish definitive hematopoiesis through the unfolded protein response pathway

Authors
Cai, Y., Wang, J., Jin, D., Liu, Q., Xianglei, C., Lili, P., Yang, L., Wang, X., Qian, F., Wang, J., Zhong, T.P., Wang, S.
Source
Full text @ Cancer Sci.

Generation of dhx15−/− zebrafish. A, DNA sequencing results of dhx15+/+ , dhx15+/− , and dhx15−/− embryos. Arrows indicate a 13 bp deletion (CTGAACCGCCATC) at dhx15 exon 2. B, B’, WISH analysis of dhx15 in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− embryos at 24 hpf. C, Western blot analysis of dhx15 in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− embryos at 3 dpf. D‐F’, Bright‐field microscopy images of dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− zebrafish. dpf, days post fertilization; hpf, hours post fertilization; WISH, whole‐mount in situ hybridization

Dhx15−/− zebrafish displayed defective definitive hematopoiesis in CHT. A‐B’, WISH analysis of cmyb expression in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− at 3 dpf (A, A’) and 4 dpf (B, B’). C‐F’, WISH analysis of mpx (C, C’), l‐plastin (D, D’), hbae1 (E, E’), rag1 (F, F’) expression in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− zebrafish. G‐I’, WISH analysis of cmyb expression in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− zebrafish at 36 hpf (G, G’), 48 hpf (H, H’), 60 hpf (I, I’). Black arrows indicate CHT; red arrows indicate ventral wall of dorsal aorta; red arrowheads indicate thymus. CHT, caudal hematopoietic tissue; dpf: days post fertilization; hpf, hours post fertilization; WISH, whole‐mount in situ hybridization

Abated proliferation but not excessive apoptosis of HSPCs is observed in dhx15−/− zebrafish. A, Schematic indicates the area of the imaging in the tail (CHT), outlined by the black box. B, C, Fluorescence images of the cmyb and apoptotic cells in CHT of dhx15+/+; Tg(cmyb:gfp) and dhx15−/−; Tg(cmyb:gfp) zebrafish embryos at 48 hours post fertilization (hpf) (B) and 60 hpf (C). D, E, Fluorescence images of pH3 and cmyb positive cells in CHT of dhx15+/+; Tg(cmyb:gfp) and dhx15−/−; Tg(cmyb:gfp) zebrafish embryos at 48 hpf (D) and 60 hpf (E). F, Number of apoptotic cells in CHT at 48 hpf (wildtype, 1.2 ± 0.2494, n = 10; dhx15−/− embryos, 1.25 ± 0.1637, n = 8; P > .05, Student’s t test) and 60 hpf (wildtype, 2.063 ± 0.3923, n = 16; dhx15−/− embryos, 10.91 ± 1.944, n = 11; P < .005, Student’s t test). G, Number of apoptotic HSPCs in CHT at 48 hpf (wildtype, 0.2 ± 0.1333, n = 10; dhx15−/− embryos, 0.375 ± 0.183, n = 8; P > .05, Student’s t test) and 60 hpf (wildtype, 0.125 ± 0.08539, n = 16; dhx15−/− embryos, 0.1818 ± 0.122, n = 11; P > .05, Student’s t test). H, Percentages of proliferating HSPCs in CHT at 48 hpf (wildtype, 11.34 ± 2.379, n = 9; dhx15−/− embryos, 13.98 ± 1.829, n = 11; P > .05, Student’s t test) and 60 hpf (wildtype, 7.464 ± 0.9413, n = 11; dhx15−/− embryos, 2.367 ± 0.6178, n = 9; P < .0005, Student’s t test). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *P < .05; **P < .005; ***P < .0005. Scale bar = 40 μm. CHT, caudal hematopoietic tissue; hpf, hours post fertilization; HSPCs, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells; ns, not significant; pH3, pospho‐histone H3

UPR pathway mediates HSPC failure in dhx15−/− zebrafish. A, qRT‐PCR analysis of CHOP, JUN, and ATF3 in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− zebrafish at 3 dpf. Each qRT‐PCR experiment was carried out in triplicates, and repeated at least three times. B‐E, WISH analysis of cmyb in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− zebrafish treated with 4‐PBA. P < .005, χ2 test. F‐I, WISH analysis of cmyb in dhx15+/+ and dhx15−/− zebrafish treated with toyocamycin. P < .005, χ2 test. Black arrow indicates caudal hematopoietic tissue. ***P < .0005. ATF3, activating transcription factor 3; dpf, days post fertilization; HSPC, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell; qRT‐PCR, quantitative real‐time PCR; UPR, unfolded protein response pathway; WISH, whole‐mount in situ hybridization; 4‐PBA, 4‐phenylbutyric acid

Definitive hematopoiesis in zebrafish is normal when DHX15 or DHX15 R222G is overexpressed. WISH analysis of definitive hematopoietic markers: cmyb (A‐A’’), hbae1 (B‐B’’), mpx (C‐C’’), and rag1 (D‐D’’). Embryos from wildtype, Tg(hsp: DHX15), and Tg(hsp: DHX15 R222G) zebrafish were heat‐shocked at 38℃ for 2 h every day since 25 hours post fertilization (hpf). DHX15, Tg(hsp: DHX15); DHX15 R222G, Tg(hsp: DHX15 R222G). Black arrows indicate caudal hematopoietic tissue; red arrowheads indicate thymus. hpf, hours post fertilization; WISH, whole‐mount in situ hybridization

DHX15 R222G is not as effective as DHX15 in restoring HSPC failure in dhx15−/− zebrafish. A, cmyb expression of wildtype zebrafish at 3 dpf. B, B’, cmyb expression of Dhx15−/−; Tg(hsp: DHX15) zebrafish at 3 dpf with (B’) or without (B) heat‐shock treatment. HSPC failure was rescued after DHX15 overexpression in dhx15−/− zebrafish (P < .0001, χ2 test). C‐C’’, cmyb expression of Dhx15−/−; Tg(hsp: DHX15 R222G) zebrafish at 3 dpf with (C’, C’’) or without (C) HS treatment. HSPC failure was rescued after DHX15 R222G overexpression in dhx15−/− zebrafish (P < .05, χ2 test). DHX15 R222G is not as effective as DHX15 in restoring HSPC failure in dhx15−/− zebrafish. (No HS vs HS, P < .05, χ2 test; No HS vs HSL, P < .0001, χ2 test; HS vs HSL, P < .005, χ2 test). D, Western blot analysis of DHX15 protein expression in DHX15/DHX15 R222G transgenic zebrafish with or without heat activation. DHX15, Dhx15−/−; Tg(hsp: DHX15); DHX15 R222G, Dhx15−/− ; Tg(hsp: DHX15 R222G); dpf, days post fertilization; hpf, hours post fertilization; HS, heat‐shocked at 38℃ for 1 h and 45 min once a day since 25 hpf; HSL, heat‐shocked at 38℃ for 2 h once a day since 25 hpf; HSPC, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell; No HS, without heat‐shock treatment. Black arrow indicates caudal hematopoietic tissue

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Cancer Sci.