FIGURE

Fig. 4

ID
ZDB-FIG-231127-77
Publication
Ali et al., 2023 - A synaptic corollary discharge signal suppresses midbrain visual processing during saccade-like locomotion
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 4

Swim-related inhibition transiently suppresses visually evoked spike output.

a Motor nerve recordings (MNR) of looming-evoked swim events and simultaneously recorded spiking activity (Vm) in three different neurons (i–iii). Stimulus onset indicated by vertical dashed line. b Population spike time histogram, evoked by looming stimuli. Spikes were counted in 100 ms bins, averaged across sweeps for each cell and then summed over all cells (n = 21 cells). c Membrane voltage change of the recorded cells in response to looming stimuli. Average across individual, baseline-subtracted cell averages (n = 21 cells, mean ± SEM). Spikes removed by interpolation between spike onset and offset. d Delay histogram of fictive swim events relative to stimulus onset. e Histogram of instantaneous spike rate, evoked by looming stimuli, aligned to swim onset. Each row represents spiking activity from one cell (n = 21). Rows in histogram vertically sorted according to onset of cell spiking relative to swim onset. f Population spike time histogram, aligned to swim onset (vertical red line), summed over all cells shown in e. g Population spike time histograms as in f, but plotted separately for cells with inhibitory charge transfer >0.8 pC (magenta), and those with negligible inhibitory charge (<0.8 pC, blue). The total spike count summed in a 300-ms window following swim onset (gray bar) is significantly smaller in the inhibited cell population (magenta) than in the population without inhibition (one-tailed comparison of measured vs predicted spike counts using Poisson statistics; p = 4.6 × 10−5). h, i Membrane voltage traces (spikes removed by interpolation), aligned to swim onset. Note the transient decrease in membrane voltage during swimming for cells receiving swim-related inhibition (arrow in panel h; average drop in Vm = −2.8 ± 0.9 mV, n = 10 cells, p = 0.014, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test), but not in cells with negligible charge transfer (panel i; average drop in Vm = −0.6 ± 0.9 mV, n = 11 cells, p = 0.7). Traces show averages across individual, baseline-subtracted cell averages (mean ± SEM, n = 10 cells in h, n = 11 cells in i). See also Supplementary Fig. 3. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Nat. Commun.