Figure 4
- ID
- ZDB-FIG-230427-18
- Publication
- McQuate et al., 2023 - Activity regulates a cell type-specific mitochondrial phenotype in zebrafish lateral line hair cells
- Other Figures
- All Figure Page
- Back to All Figure Page
(A) Representative young HCs from a 3 dpf neuromasts (NM) (NM6, Figure 4—source data 2). Max mito shown in gold. Synaptic ribbons shown in purple. Scale bar = 8 µm. (A’) Representative older HCs from a 3 dpf NM (NM6, Figure 4—source data 2). Scale bar = 6 µm. (B) Comparison of total mitochondrial volume development (left) and average (right) between 3 dpf and 5–6 dpf HCs. On average (in µm3): 3 dpf: 14.4 ± 1.2; 5–6 dpf: 14.8 ± 0.8. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.49. (C) Total HC volume for 3 dpf and 5–6 dpf HCs. (In µm3) 3 dpf: 210.1 ± 11.3; 5–6 dpf: 195.6 ± 7.2. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.2. (C’) Ratio of total mitochondrial volume to HC volume. 3 dpf: 0.06 ± 0.003; 5–6 dpf: 0.07 ± 0.003. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.41. (D) Comparison of the number of HC mitochondria over development (left) and on average (right) in 3 dpf and 5–6 dpf HCs. On average: 3 dpf: 25.0 ± 2; 5–6 dpf: 36.1 ± 1.6. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.022. (E) Comparison of the median mitochondrial volume over development (left) and on average (right). On average (in µm3): 3 dpf: 0.3 ± 0.02; 5–6 dpf: 0.2 ± 0.01. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.005. (F) Comparison of the max mito volume over development (left) and on average (right). On average (in µm3): 3 dpf: 3.8 ± 0.5; 5–6 dpf: 3.5 ± 0.4. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.32. (G) Comparison of the max mito z-score in 3 dpf and 5–6 dpf HCs over development (left) and on average (right). On average: 3 dpf: 3.7 ± 0.3; 5–6 dpf: 4.1 ± 0.1. Standard unpaired t-test, p=0.21. (B–G) Solid line represents the standard linear regression for 3 dpf HCs. Dashed line represents standard regression for the 5–6 dpf HCs dataset as in Figure 2. Significance of the 3 dpf regression and difference with 5–6 dpf regression slope (S) are indicated. (H) The percentage of the max mito located within each quadrant of 3 dpf HCs represented as a heat map. Two HCs in the 3 dpf dataset lacked ribbons to provide a consistent HC lowest point and were not included in this analysis. (I) Summary of the heat map data shown in (H). Most apical quadrant (0–25%): 24.9 ± 8.9%; 25–50%: 37.2 ± 5.7%; 50–75%: 16.0 ± 4.2%; Most basal quadrant (75–100%): 22.0 ± 7.9%. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons, nonsignificant. (J) Percentage of max mito located within the most basal quadrant for individual HCs. 3 dpf: 22.0 ± 7.9%, 5–6 dpf: 52.8 ± 4.4%. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p=0.017. Same cells as in (H, I). (B, D–G) 3 dpf data: n = 12 HCs, 2 NMs, 2 fish. 5–6 dpf data: n = 65 HCs, 5 NMs, 3 fish. (C, C’) 3 dpf data: n = 12 HCs, 2 NMs, 2 fish. 5–6 dpf data: n = 35 HCs, 3 NMs, 3 fish. (H–J) 3 dpf data: n = 10 HCs, 2 NMs, 2 fish. 5–6 dpf data: n = 65 HCs, 5 NMs, 3 fish. Where applicable, data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
|