FIGURE

Fig. 4

ID
ZDB-FIG-150805-4
Publication
Labalette et al., 2015 - Molecular dissection of segment formation in the developing hindbrain
Other Figures
(all 7)
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 4

Dynamics of enhancer C activity and its regulation by Hox PG1 and Nlz factors. (A-G) Time-course analysis of enhancer C activity. The Tg(cC:gfp) line was analysed by double ISH with gfp (purple) and krox20 (orange) probes, at the indicated stages (A-D). Single ISH was also performed with the gfp probe (E-G). (H,I) Tg(cC:gfp) embryos were injected with a control morpholino (moCtrl) or morpholinos for hoxb1a and hoxb1b (moHoxb1), and subjected to ISH with gfp and ntl probes at 100% epiboly (three independent experiments). The insets show tailbud views of the embryos, allowing the developmental stage to be evaluated by extent of tailbud closure. (J,K) Tg(cC:gfp) embryos were injected with control or hoxb1a mRNA and subjected to ISH with a gfp probe at 4s (three independent experiments). (L,M) Tg(cC:gfp) embryos were injected with a control morpholino or morpholinos for nlz1 and nlz2 (moNlz), and subjected to ISH with a gfp probe at 100% epiboly.
Expression Data
Gene:
Fish:
Knockdown Reagents: (all 6)
Anatomical Terms:
Stage Range: 90%-epiboly to 5-9 somites

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data
Fish:
Knockdown Reagents: (all 6)
Observed In:
Stage: Bud

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Development
Your Input Welcome
We welcome your input and comments. Please use this form to recommend updates to the information in ZFIN. We appreciate as much detail as possible and references as appropriate. We will review your comments promptly.