FIGURE SUMMARY
Title

Sensorimotor Decision Making in the Zebrafish Tectum

Authors
Barker, A.J., Baier, H.
Source
Full text @ Curr. Biol.

RGCs and Tectal Neurons Contribute to Size Discrimination

(A) Size discrimination tuning curves of Atoh7:Gal4, UAS:Nfsb-mChry-ablated fish (n = 14; yellow) and control conditions (Atoh7:Gal4, UAS:Nfsb-mChry with no MTZ treatment, n = 20, black; Atoh7:Gal4, UAS:Dendra with MTZ treatment, n = 10, gray). When RGCs are ablated, values are not significantly different from zero (p > 0.07 for all sizes except 30° [p = 0.039] and 40° [p = 0.012]; one-sample t test; Bonferroni correction).

(B) Tuning curves of enucleated and control siblings (enucleated, n = 7, orange; control, n = 10, black). Under enucleated conditions, values are not different from zero (p > 0.30 for all sizes; one-sample t test; Bonferroni correction).

(C) Expression pattern of Gal4s1013t shown in a 5-dpf larvae-expressing UAS:EGFP. Gal4s1013t labels a large portion, but not all, of the tectal neurons.

(D) Tuning curve in Gal4s1013t-silenced larvae. When compared to WT siblings, Gal4s1013t, UAS:TeTxLC-CFP larvae showed a marked reduction in R.I., with no responses significantly different from zero (experimental, n = 7, red; control, n = 4, black; p > 0.200 for all sizes; one-sample t test; Bonferroni correction).

(E) Expression pattern of Gal4s1038t shown in a larva expressing UAS:Kaede. Expression is restricted to the posterior tectum.

(F) Tuning curves of Gal4s1038t, UAS:Nfsb-mChry-ablated fish (n = 18; green) and control conditions (Gal4s1038t, UAS:Nfsb-mChry with no MTZ treatment, n = 26, black; Gal4s1038t, UAS:Kaede with MTZ treatment, n = 10, gray). No significant changes in the R.I. are observed in ablated larvae compared to controls (two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction).

(G) Expression pattern of Gal4s1156t, UAS:Kaede, labeling a subset of the SINs (yellow arrows), as well as additional tectal neurons.

(H) Tuning curves for SIN-ablated fish (n = 16; blue) and control larvae (n = 16; black). SIN-restricted ablations were performed in Gal4s1156t, UAS:Kaede using a two-photon laser. R.I. is significantly reduced at 30° (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction; p at 20° = 0.068; p at 30° = 0.040).

(I) SIN-ablated larvae show fewer behavioral responses (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction; uncorrected p at 30° = 0.004; same larvae as in H).

(J) SIN-ablated larvae have an unchanged V.I. (ablated, n = 25, gray; non-ablated, n = 16, black; two-way ANOVA; Bonferroni correction; same larvae as in H).

The scale bars represent 50 µm; A, anterior; L, lateral; M, medial; P, posterior. Hatched yellow lines denote the optic tecta for each image. Neuropil is indicated in the right tectum with a yellow arrow. For all panels, error bars indicate the SEM. p < 0.05. See also Figure S3.

Ablation and Activation of Gal4mpn354 Neurons Alter Behavioral Tuning in Opposite Directions

(A) Expression pattern in the 5-dpf optic tectum in a Gal4mpn354, UAS:Dendra fish.

(B) R.I. of Gal4mpn354, UAS:Nfsb-mChry larvae (MTZ-treated, n = 31, orange; no MTZ, n = 24, black) and Gal4mpn354, UAS:Dendra (MTZ-treated, n = 12, gray). Following ablation, the R.I. for a 1° dot switches from approach to avoidance (two-way ANOVA; Tukey’s correction; p at 1° = 0.038 and 0.032).

(C) The fraction of behavioral responses is not changed in Gal4mpn354-ablated larvae (p = 0.647, 0.621, and 0.655 at 1°, 5°, and 10° sizes, respectively).

(D) V.I. plots of fish used in (B). At 1°, V.I. is switched from approach to avoidance following ablation of Gal4mpn354 neurons (Fisher’s exact test; p at 1° = 0.0003; p = 1.00 at 5°; p = 1.00 at 10°).

(E and F) ChR2 activation of Gal4mpn354 neurons enhances approach behaviors at small sizes. (E) The V.I. for Gal4mpn354 neurons is shifted to approach when compared to wild-type siblings exposed to the same blue light stimulation (Fisher’s exact test; p = 0.015 at 1°). (F) The fraction of approaches is significantly increased at 1° when Gal4mpn354 neurons are activated (unpaired t test; Bonferroni correction; uncorrected p = 0.014 at 1°).

For all panels, error bars indicate the SEM. p < 0.05; p < 0.005; p < 0.0005. See also Figure S5 and Movie S3.

Most Gal4mpn354 Neurons Are Glutamatergic nsPVINs

(A) Single cell labeling of a Gal4mpn354 neuron using the BGUG method.

(B) Close-up and line drawing of the single Gal4mpn354 neuron shown in (A).

(C and D) Examples of co-localization of Gal4mpn354,UAS:GCaMP6s (green) expression and vglut2a:loxP-DsRed-loxP-GFP (magenta) or gad1b:loxP-DsRed-loxP-GFP expression (magenta).

(E) The majority of Gal4mpn354-labeled neurons are glutamatergic (VGlut2a; 76%). A minority are GABAergic (Gad1b; 22%). p = 4.8 × 107; unpaired t test.

The scale bar in (A) represents 50 µm and in (B) represents 10 µm. Error bars indicate the SEM. p < 0.0005.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Curr. Biol.