| 
    
        
            
                
            
            
        
    
    
        
        
        
            Telomere shortening induces micronuclei formation and transposon mobilization. (A) Quantification of mean telomere length measured by TRF analysis in the skin (nWT = 5, ntert-/- = 5, nsting-/- = 5, ntert-/- sting-/- = 4, WT vs tert-/-p = 0.017, tert-/- vs sting-/-p = 0.002, sting-/- vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.008). (B) Quantification of mean telomere length measured by TRF analysis in the testis (nWT = 4, ntert-/- = 6, nsting-/- = 5, ntert-/- sting-/- = 6, WT vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.008). (C) Quantification of mean telomere length measured by TRF analysis in the kidney marrow (nWT = 3, ntert-/- = 4, nsting-/- = 7, ntert-/- sting-/- = 7, WT vs tert-/-p = 0.000003, WT vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.0008, tert-/- vs sting-/-p = 0.000001, sting-/- vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.0005, tert-/- vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.003). (D) Quantification of mean telomere length measured by TRF analysis in the intestine (nWT = 6, ntert-/- = 6, nsting-/- = 6, ntert-/- sting-/- = 6, WT vs tert-/-p = 0.0007, WT vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.015, tert-/- vs sting-/-p = 0.0004, sting-/- vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.008). In each boxplot (A–D), the boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR; 25th to 75th percentile). Inside each box, the horizontal line indicates the median. The whiskers extend to the most extreme data points (minima and maxima) within 1.5 × IQR from the quartiles. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images and quantifications of MN formation in the fibroblasts derived from skin (nWT = 1, ntert-/- = 1, nsting-/- = 1, ntert-/- sting-/- = 1, WT vs tert-/-p = 0.040, WT vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.034, tert-/- vs sting-/-p = 0.047, sting-/- vs tert-/- sting-/-p = 0.040). The yellow arrows point at the micronuclei. Scale bar = 5 µm. (F) Representative western blot images and quantification of H3K9me3 in the skin (nWT = 6, ntert-/- = 6, WT vs tert-/-p = 0.032). (G) RT-qPCR analysis of ltr-2 gene expression (nWT = 3, ntert-/- = 3, WT vs tert-/-p = 0.038). Data in Fig. 1E–G are presented as the mean ± s.e.m.; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, using a one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (panel A–E), or unpaired t-test (panel F, G). Source data are available online for this figure. 
                
             |