FIGURE

Fig. s3

ID
ZDB-FIG-110322-29
Publication
Ogura et al., 2009 - Adaptation of GAL4 activators for GAL4 enhancer trapping in zebrafish
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. s3

Supp. Fig. 3. Comparison of the toxicity and transactivation potentials of the variant GAL4 activators including GAL4VP16413-470 in zebrafish embryos. A: Comparison of the toxicity levels of the various GAL4 activators. The indicated GAL4 activator mRNAs (10, 20, or 30 pg) were injected into one- to two-cell-stage embryos (TL line) and morphological abnormalities at 28–30 hpf were classified according to their severity into five groups: normal, weakly malformed, moderately malformed, severely malformed, and lethal phenotypes. The affected tissues varied depending on the activators as shown in B. EGFP mRNA (30 pg) was also injected as a control. B: Typical morphologies for each phenotypic class. GAL4NFkB (a, 10 pg; b–d, 30 pg), GAL4VPmad2 (e–h, 20 pg), and GAL4VP16413-470 (i, 20 pg; j,k, 30 pg). Because GAL4VP16413-470 caused defects in the eye and the anterior CNS (insets of j, k) without significantly affecting posterior development, the anterior phenotype was mainly used as a criterion of phenotypic classes. C: Comparison of the transactivation potentials of GAL4VP16, GAL4VPmad3, GAL4VPmad2, and GAL4VP16413-470. Co-injection of GAL4 activator mRNAs (2 pg) with the UAS:Venusluc reporter vector was carried out as described in Figure 3. A low amount of activator mRNAs was used, as the adverse effects of GAL4VP16 are negligible at this expression level.

Expression Data

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Dev. Dyn.