FIGURE

Fig. 4

ID
ZDB-FIG-080324-8
Publication
Smith et al., 2008 - Gene expression analysis on sections of zebrafish regenerating fins reveals limitations in the whole-mount in situ hybridization method
Other Figures
All Figure Page
Back to All Figure Page
Fig. 4

Comparison of the expression of fgfr1 and wfgf genes in 4-day fin regenerates using the two ISH methods. A, B: Whole-mount ISH showing expression of fgfr1 and wfgf in the distal region of the fin regenerate at 4 dpa. C: Upon sectioning of the whole-mount fins, fgfr1 expression is seen in the distal blastema, in the basal layer of the epidermis, and in a few cells of the newly differentiating scleroblasts. D: ISH on sections reveals a broader expression domain for fgfr1: transcripts are observed in the blastema midway through the proximal-distal axis. It is observed, not only in newly differentiating scleroblasts, but also in differentiated scleroblasts in more proximal regions lining the inner side of the lepidotrichia (arrowheads in D indicate scleroblasts). E: Sections of whole-mount fins hybridized with the wfgf probe shows that wfgf expression is confined to the epidermis in the most distal tip of the regenerate (arrowhead). F: wfgf expression following ISH on sections is similar to that seen following whole-mount ISH (arrowhead). Arrows in A and B indicate the level of amputation. L, lepidotrichia; b, blastema; ble, basal layer of epidermis; e, epidermis; s, scleroblasts. Scale bars = 100 μm (A,B), 50 μm (C-F).

Expression Data
Genes:
Fish:
Condition:
Anatomical Terms:
Stage: Adult

Expression Detail
Antibody Labeling
Phenotype Data

Phenotype Detail
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Dev. Dyn.