- Title
-
3' RNA-seq is superior to standard RNA-seq in cases of sparse data but inferior at identifying toxicity pathways in a model organism
- Authors
- McClure, R.S., Rericha, Y., Waters, K.M., Tanguay, R.L.
- Source
- Full text @ Front Bioinform
Alignment of standard and 3′ RNA-seq data. Percentage alignment is shown against the entire genome (blue bars), against regions of the genomes with annotated features (mRNA, tRNA, rRNA, other known non-coding RNA, orange bars) or against non-feature regions (grey bars). Individual samples are shown on the x-axis with sample groupings indicated above. C = standard RNA-seq samples from fish treated with control conditions, FBSA = standard RNA-seq samples from fish treated with FBSA, LexC = 3′ RNA-seq samples from fish treated with control conditions, LexFBSA = 3′ RNA-seq samples from fish treated with FBSA. Numbers at the end of the sample names indicate biological replicates. |
DEG overlap among 3′ and standard RNA-seq. |
DEG identification with sparse data. |
Statistical significance and intersection of 3′ and standard RNA-seq enriched functions. For all functions found by both standard and 3′ RNA-seq DEG functional enrichment the −log10 of the q-value is shown. Red bars represent q-values of functions enriched from the 3′ RNA-seq DEG list and blue bars represent functions enriched from the standard RNA-seq DEG list. |
Number of enriched functions identified with 3′ and standard RNA-seq DEG lists using sparse data and q-value defined data. |