IMAGE

Figure 2.

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-231116-37
Source
Figures for Paquette et al., 2023
Image
Figure Caption

Figure 2.

Optogenetic modulation of PFOS-exposed microglia. (A) Schematic of halorhodopsin: Optogenetic modulation of microglia electrical state is achieved via photostimulation of the light-gated chloride pump, halorhodopsin (eNpHR3.0). eNpHR3.0 is most responsive to 589-nm wavelength light. (B) eNpHR3.0 was driven under a pan-macrophage promoter [Tg(mpeg1:GalFF;UAS:eNpHR3.0-mCherry)] to achieve optogenetic control of microglia in zebrafish larvae. (C) Experimental paradigm: At 72 hpf, injured or uninjured zebrafish were stimulated for 4 h with 589-nm light in the enclosed Noldus DanioVision Behavior Unit. (D) Confocal micrograph of 3-dpf zebrafish brain exposed to 28μM PFOS. Magenta cells are unstimulated halorhodopsin+ microglia. (E) Pseudocolored (D) in black and white. (E′–E″) 3× magnification of microglia from boxes in (E). Arrows point to projections emanating from the microglia cell bodies. (F) Dorsal view of a representative 3-dpf control-treated larval brain at 4 hpi without stimulation. Injury site marked with magenta dot and area of responding microglia shaded in magenta. (G) Dorsal view of a representative 3-dpf 28μM PFOS-treated larval brain at 4 hpi without stimulation. (H) Confocal micrograph of 3-dpf 28μM PFOS-treated larval brain following stimulation with 589-nm light. Magenta cells are stimulated halorhodopsin+ microglia. (I) Pseudocolored (H) in black and white. (I′–I″) 3× magnification of microglia from boxes in (I). Arrows point to projections emanating from the microglia cell bodies. (J) Dorsal view of a representative 3-dpf control-treated larval brain at 4 hpi following 589-nm light stimulation. (K) Dorsal view of a representative 3-dpf 28μM PFOS-treated larval brain at 4 hpi following 589-nm light stimulation. (L) Quantification of microglia cell area of 3-dpf 28μM PFOS-treated larvae with and without light stimulation. (M) Quantification of microglia cell perimeter of 3-dpf 28μM PFOS-treated larvae with and without light stimulation. (N) Perimeter-to-area ratio of individual microglia of 3-dpf 28μM PFOS-treated larvae with and without light stimulation. n=4042 cells per group from three independent experiments. (O) Quantification of the area of microglia response around the injury site at 4 hpi. n=915 fish per group. Confocal micrographs at 40× magnification (D–E″ and H–I″) or 20× magnification (F,G,J,K). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001. Error bars represent standard deviation. Box plot limits represent 25th to 75th percentile, with the midline representing the median. See Excel Table S1 for additional statistical details. Note: dpf, days post fertilization; hpf, hours postfertilization; ns, not significant; PFOS, perfluorooctane sulfonate.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Environ. Health Perspect.