IMAGE

Fig. 2

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-221101-13
Source
Figures for Ulloa et al., 2021
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 2

Dynamic regulation of the drl promoter distinguishes HSPC subsets

(A) UMAP dimensional reduction and unsupervised clustering of drl:mCherry+;gata1:GFP cells at 1 and 2 dpf showing their original collection time point.

(B) mCherry expression level driven by the drl promoter for the different cell types collected at 1 and 2 dpf.

(C) (i) Schematic illustrating drl-specific, 4-OHT-inducible lineage-tracing system. Tg(drl:creERT2) homozygous transgenic fish were crossed with hemizygous ubi:loxP-GFP-stop-loxP-mCherry (ubi:Switch). (ii) Zebrafish embryos were exposed to 12 μM 4-OH-tamoxifen (4-OHT) or ethanol (EtOH) vehicle control for 20 h starting at either 30 hpf (labeled as Prog+, which includes embryonic progenitors and HSCs) or 54 hpf (labeled as HSC). Those embryos exposed to 4-OHT induce Cre recombination of loxP sites, leading to a permanent “switch” excising the GFP cassette and resulting in expression of mCherry fluorescence. The resulting mCherry+ cells are the descendants of Prog+− and HSC-labeled cells. (iii) Representative flow cytometry analysis: forward (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) parameters were used to define the major blood cell populations (erythroid, myeloid, lymphoid, and precursor) in whole kidney marrow (WKM) (>3 months). (iv) The frequency of mCherry+ cells within each cell lineage was then calculated. Example flow cytometry plots (right) of mCherry contribution to the myeloid population. Gates were set based on EtOH-treated “non-switched” controls.

(D) Quantification of mCherry+ percentage from experimental groups Prog+ and HSCs within each blood cell lineage found in WKM at >3 months post-fertilization (zebrafish adulthood). Data points represent individual zebrafish WKM with mean ± SEM (n = 5–12).

(E) Quantification of mCherry+ percentage at 1–5 days post-labeling in Prog+ and HSC-labeled cohorts. n = 5–11 samples, 7–10 pooled larvae per sample. Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test was used for analysis (mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05; ****p ≤ 0.0001. See also Figure S2.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Cell Rep.