ZFIN Image: Hou et al., 2016, Fig. 3

Image

Figure Caption

Fig. 3

Reaction of HSPCs to different E. coli burdens after intravenous injection.

(A), Fluorescence images showing the runx1-GFP⁺ cells in Tg(runx1:en-GFP) larvae treated with different volumes of E. coli at 2 dpi (4 dpf). Scale bars, 20 μm. (B), The number of runx1-GFP⁺ cells in larvae treated with 5–10 × 10³ cfu E. coli or PBS. (70.31 ± 4.18 vs 71.14 ± 4.42; 148.8 ± 7.14 vs 137.6 ± 8.65 in E. coli vs PBS group at each time points. N ≥ 7 in each group). (C), Calculation of the runx1-GFP⁺ cells in (A) (137.6 ± 8.65; 194.6 ± 15.63; 148.8 ± 7.14; 103.4 ± 8.38 in each group. N ≥ 8 in each group). (D), WISH of cmyb (red arrows) in the larval CHT treated with different volumes of E. coli at 2 dpi (4 dpf). (E), The data obtained for cmyb⁺ cells at different time points after treatment with 5–10 × 10³ cfu E. coli or PBS (102.80 ± 11.67 vs 82.40 ± 6.59; 114.00 ± 4.97 vs 112.00 ± 6.60; 121.60 ± 9.70 vs 127.00 ± 6.69; 129.00 ± 13.71 vs 127.60 ± 8.20; 203.80 ± 17.06 vs 226.40 ± 20.07 in E. coli vs PBS group at each time point. N = 8 in each group). (F), Calculation of the cmyb⁺ cells in (D) (221.60 ± 18.56; 268.70 ± 17.77; 203.80 ± 17.06; 89.30 ± 12.54 in each group. N = 10 in each group).

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Sci. Rep.