IMAGE

Fig. 2

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-170509-2
Source
Figures for Pradhan et al., 2017
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 2

Defining a time interval during which FGF signaling prevents ectopic amhc expression. (A-C) In situ hybridization depicts amhc expression in frontal views of nontransgenic (A) and Tg(hsp70:dnfgfr1) (B,C) embryos at 50 hpf. Heat shock at 24 hpf (A,B) induces ectopic amhc-expressing cells in nearly all Tg(hsp70:dnfgfr1) embryos (B; n=22/24), whereas ectopic cells are induced less frequently with heat shock at 28 hpf (C; n=6/36). Heat shock at 18 hpf gives rise to approximately 20-30 ectopic amhc-expressing cells (Fig. 1C), heat shock at 24 hpf induces approximately five to ten ectopic amhc-expressing cells (B, arrowhead), and approximately two to three ectopic cells are produced with heat shock at 28 hpf (C, arrowhead). (D-F) Three-dimensional reconstructions of immunofluorescence, as in Fig. 1E-H, of nontransgenic (D) and Tg(hsp70:dnfgfr1) (E,F) embryos. Whereas Tg(hsp70:dnfgfr1) embryos heat shocked at 18 hpf (Fig. 1G) typically display ectopic amhc-expressing cells in the ventricular inner curvature and at the arterial pole, Tg(hsp70:dnfgfr1) embryos heat shocked at 24 (E) and 28 hpf (F) primarily exhibit ectopic cells at the arterial pole (arrowheads) [n=15 for nontransgenic, n=10 per condition for Tg(hsp70:dnfgfr1)]. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Development