(A) For analysis of tissue specific Cxcr2 expression TRAP was performed on 3.5 dpf transgenic krt4-EGFP-L10a and mpx-EGFP-L10a larvae and one-step RT-PCR was performed. cxcr2 expression is observed in the epidermis and in neutrophils. mpx expression is only observed in neutrophils supporting that there is not neutrophil contamination in the epidermal samples. (B) Schematic diagram to illustrate the cell transplantation used to generate chimeric HRas^V12 expressing larvae in which the transformed cells express either control MO or Cxcr2 MO. (C–D) Fluorescent Z stack projections of live 3.5 dpf of transgenic mpx:GFP (green neutrophils) larvae with control MO in the HRas^V12 expressing cells (C) or with cxcr2 MO within the HRas^V12 expressing cells (D). (E) Quantification of C–D (as a ratio of neutrophils per transformed cell) shows a statistically significant decrease in neutrophil recruitment to HRas^V12 expressing cells that have cxcr2 MO compared to HRas^V12 expressing cells that have control MO. (F) Quantitative RT-PCR (one representative graph shown n = 3) indicates a statistically significant decrease in slug, vimentin and mmp9 transcripts in HRas^V12 expressing cells that have cxcr2 MO compared to HRas^V12 expressing cells with control MO. (G) Schematic illustrating the requirement for Cxcr2 in neutrophils for initial neutrophil recruitment to transformed cells as well as a cell autonomous function of Cxcr2 in transformed cells to mediate changes associated with EMT. * = P<.05, ** = P<.01, *** = P<.001. Scale bar = 20 microns.

Figure Data

Expression / Labeling details

Acknowledgments

This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ PLoS One