IMAGE

Fig. 6

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-131029-18
Source
Figures for Powell et al., 2013
Image
Figure Caption

Fig. 6

Prdm1a dominant activator and dominant repressor constructs directly regulate foxd3 and tfap2a enhancers. (A-C) Zebrafish embryos at the 2-somite stage expressing foxd3E1:GFP alone (A) or with prdm1aDBD-EnR dominant repressor (B) or prdm1aDBD-VP16 dominant activator (C). GFP expression is downregulated when foxd3E1:GFP is co-injected with prdm1aDBD-EnR (asterisks) and upregulated when the enhancer construct is co-expressed with prdm1aDBD-VP16. (D,E) The percentage of embryos expressing GFP (D) and GFP pixel intensity (E) in A-C. (D) foxd3E1:GFP, n=19/22; EnR, n=6/19; VP16, n=28/32. (E) foxd3E1:GFP, n=17; EnR, n=10; VP16, n=10. (F-H) Two-somite embryos expressing tfap2aE2:GFP with prdm1aDBD-EnR also exhibit downregulated GFP (G, asterisks), whereas when co-expressed with prdm1aDBD-VP16 they display increased GFP expression (H). (I,J) Percentage of GFP-positive embryos (I) and GFP pixel intensity (J) in F-H. (I) tfap2aE2:GFP, n=11/16; EnR, n=16/36; VP16, n=36/39. (J) tfap2aE2:GFP, n=11; EnR, n=14; VP16, n=12. *P<0.05. Error bars indicate s.e.m.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Development