HUMAN DISEASE MODELED by edn1^{tf216b/tf216b}
No data available

GENE EXPRESSION
Gene expression in edn1^{tf216b/tf216b}

PHENOTYPE
Phenotype in edn1^{tf216b/tf216b}

Phenotype	Conditions	Figures
branchiomeric skeletal muscle development decreased process quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
branchiostegal ray decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010 Table 1  from Kimmel et al., 2003
cartilage morphogenesis disrupted, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9 ,  Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
ceratobranchial 5 bone decreased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Kimmel et al., 2003
ceratobranchial 5 bone malformed, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Kimmel et al., 2003
ceratohyal cartilage absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010
ceratohyal cartilage aplastic, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Nair et al., 2007 Fig. 3  from Walker et al., 2006
ceratohyal cartilage decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010 Fig. 9 ,  Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998 Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
ceratohyal cartilage inverted, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Kimmel et al., 1998
ceratohyal cartilage morphology, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
ceratohyal cartilage structure, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Kimmel et al., 1998
cleithrum decreased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Kimmel et al., 2003
cleithrum malformed, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Kimmel et al., 2003
dentary curved caudal, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Kimmel et al., 2003
dentary fused with maxilla, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Kimmel et al., 2003
dentary malformed, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2 ,  Fig. 3  from Kimmel et al., 2003
embryonic viscerocranium morphogenesis decreased process quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1 ,  Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
embryonic viscerocranium morphogenesis disrupted, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3 ,  Fig. 8  from Miller et al., 2003
head lacks all parts of type ventral intermandibularis anterior, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
head lacks all parts of type ventral intermandibularis posterior, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
hindbrain fzd7a expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Kamel et al., 2013
hyohyoideus decreased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
hyosymplectic cartilage fused with ceratohyal cartilage, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Miller et al., 2000
hyosymplectic cartilage increased width, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
interhyal-epihyal joint absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9 ,  Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
interhyoideus decreased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
interhyoideus physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
mandibular arch skeleton joint absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Walker et al., 2006
mandibular muscle wholly dorsalized, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 8  from Miller et al., 2003
maxilla curved caudal, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Kimmel et al., 2003
maxilla malformed, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2 ,  Fig. 3  from Kimmel et al., 2003
Meckel's cartilage absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010
Meckel's cartilage aplastic, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
Meckel's cartilage bent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Choudhry et al., 2011
Meckel's cartilage decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010 Fig. 3  from Nair et al., 2007 Fig. 3  from Walker et al., 2006 Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998 Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
Meckel's cartilage fused with palatoquadrate cartilage, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Choudhry et al., 2011
Meckel's cartilage mislocalised posteriorly, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
Meckel's cartilage morphology, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
Meckel's cartilage protruding, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Choudhry et al., 2011
mouth concave 3-D shape, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
mouth quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. for (tf216b)  from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
neurocranium morphology, normal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
opercle aplastic, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
opercle increased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 4  from Kimmel et al., 2003
opercle increased variability of size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S4  from Askary et al., 2017 Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010
opercle size, abnormal	standard conditions	Table 1  from Kimmel et al., 2003
opercle cartilaginous joint distended, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2 ,  Fig. 4  from Kimmel et al., 2003
opercle cartilaginous joint increased thickness, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 4  from Kimmel et al., 2003
ossification disrupted, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Kimmel et al., 2003
palatoquadrate cartilage decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Walker et al., 2006 Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
palatoquadrate cartilage fused with Meckel's cartilage, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Miller et al., 2000
palatoquadrate cartilage fused with hyosymplectic cartilage, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Choudhry et al., 2011
palatoquadrate cartilage increased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Choudhry et al., 2011
pharyngeal arch frzb expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch nkx3-2 expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch wnt9a expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch fzd7a expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Kamel et al., 2013
pharyngeal arch neural crest cell prrx1a expression increased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch neural crest cell prrx1b expression increased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region barx1 expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region dlx5a expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region prrx1b expression increased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch ventral region prrx1a expression increased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 1 foxc1a expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxf1 expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxd1 expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S2  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxc1b expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S2  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxd1 expression decreased distribution, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S2  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 foxd2 expression increased distribution, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 1 malformed, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Zuniga et al., 2011
pharyngeal arch 1 position, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
pharyngeal arch 1 joint physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Miller et al., 2003
pharyngeal arch 1 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 1 ventral region decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 1 ventral region decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 1 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 2 foxc1a expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 foxd1 expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S2  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 barx1 expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 foxc1b expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S2  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 foxd1 expression decreased distribution, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. S2  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 foxd2 expression increased distribution, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 malformed, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Zuniga et al., 2011
pharyngeal arch 2 position, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 10  from Kimmel et al., 1998
pharyngeal arch 2 foxf1 expression spatial pattern, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Xu et al., 2018
pharyngeal arch 2 joint irx7 expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Askary et al., 2015
pharyngeal arch 2 joint irx5a expression absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 1  from Askary et al., 2015
pharyngeal arch 2 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region barx1 expression decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 8  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region prrx1b expression increased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 8  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch 2 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 3 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 3 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 3 skeleton decreased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
pharyngeal arch 3-7 skeleton quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. for (tf216b)  from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
pharyngeal arch 4 mesenchymal cell physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 4 ventral region physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 5 ,  Fig. 6  from Miller et al., 2000
pharyngeal arch 4 skeleton decreased length, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
pharyngeal arch cartilage ventral region decreased amount, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal arch cartilage ventral region morphology, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Barske et al., 2016
pharyngeal pouch 1 physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
splanchnocranium quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. for (tf216b)  from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)
stomodeum mislocalised ventrally, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
symplectic absent, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Choudhry et al., 2011 Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010
symplectic decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 6  from Zuniga et al., 2010
ventral hyoid arch morphology, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 9  from Kimmel et al., 1998
ventral intermandibularis anterior physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
ventral intermandibularis posterior physical object quality, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 7  from Miller et al., 2000
ventral mandibular arch aplastic, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Nair et al., 2007
ventral mandibular arch decreased size, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 2  from Piotrowski et al., 1996
ventral mandibular arch orientation eye, abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. 3  from Kimmel et al., 2003
whole organism lethal (sensu genetics), abnormal	standard conditions	Fig. for (tf216b)  from Phenotype Annotation (1994-2006)