ZFIN ID: ZDB-FISH-150901-23024
Fish name: cfap298tm304/tm304
Genotype: cfap298tm304/tm304
Targeting Reagent: none
HUMAN DISEASE MODELED by cfap298tm304/tm304
Human Disease Conditions Citations
idiopathic scoliosis temperature exposure Grimes et al., 2016
GENE EXPRESSION
Gene expression in cfap298tm304/tm304
Protein expression
Antibody Antigen Genes Structure Conditions Figures
Ab1-RF standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018
Reporter gene expression No data available
PHENOTYPE
Phenotype in cfap298tm304/tm304
Phenotype Conditions Figures
central canal collapsed, abnormal standard conditions Figure 4 with image from Thouvenin et al., 2020
central canal curved, abnormal standard conditions Figure 4 with image from Thouvenin et al., 2020
central canal decreased diameter, abnormal standard conditions Figure 4 with image from Thouvenin et al., 2020
central canal cerebrospinal fluid circulation decreased rate, abnormal standard conditions Figure 4 with image from Thouvenin et al., 2020
cilium or flagellum-dependent cell motility decreased rate, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
determination of heart left/right asymmetry decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
determination of left/right symmetry disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
determination of liver left/right asymmetry decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
determination of pancreatic left/right asymmetry decreased process quality, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
female organism female fertility, normal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
fourth ventricle cerebrospinal fluid circulation decreased process quality, abnormal heat exposure Fig. 2 from Grimes et al., 2016
heart bilateral symmetry, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
heart looping disrupted, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
inner ear kinocilium structure, normal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
male organism male sterile, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
neural tube bilateral symmetry, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 5 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
peripheral olfactory organ cilium structure, normal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
post-vent region curved ventral, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Sullivan-Brown et al., 2008
Fig. 1 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
Table 2 from Chen et al., 1996
pronephric duct cilium decreased length, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
pronephric duct cilium disoriented, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
pronephric duct motile cilium has normal numbers of parts of type pronephric duct outer dynein arm, ameliorated cold exposure Fig. 2 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
pronephric duct motile cilium lacks all parts of type pronephric duct outer dynein arm, abnormal heat exposure Fig. 2 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
pronephric duct outer dynein arm assembly decreased occurrence, abnormal heat exposure Fig. 2 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
pronephric duct outer dynein arm assembly occurrence, ameliorated cold exposure Fig. 2 with image from Jaffe et al., 2016
pronephric glomerulus decreased thickness, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
pronephric glomerulus increased size, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Sullivan-Brown et al., 2008
pronephric tubule dilated, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 3 with imageFig. 5 with image from Sullivan-Brown et al., 2008
pronephric tubule distended, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 2 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
pronephros cystic, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Sullivan-Brown et al., 2008
Fig. 1 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
Table 2 from Chen et al., 1996
Reissner's fiber Ab1-RF labeling decreased amount, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018
Reissner's fiber malformed, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018
Reissner's fiber Ab1-RF labeling spatial pattern, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 4 with image from Cantaut-Belarif et al., 2018
retinal photoreceptor layer morphology, normal standard conditions Fig. 3 with image from Zhao et al., 2007
trunk curved ventral, abnormal standard conditions Fig. 1 with image from Sullivan-Brown et al., 2008
vertebral column asymmetrically curved, abnormal temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column asymmetrically curved, abnormal temperature exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column asymmetrically curved, abnormal temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, normal temperature exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curvature, normal cold exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column curved ventral, abnormal heat exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis decreased process quality, abnormal temperature exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis decreased process quality, abnormal temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis decreased process quality, abnormal temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, ameliorated temperature exposure Fig. 4 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, normal temperature exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016
vertebral column skeletal system morphogenesis process quality, normal cold exposure Fig. 3 from Grimes et al., 2016

CITATIONS  (9)